WEIGEL ON TWO YEARS OF BENEDICT XVI
This comes from THE PILOT, official newspaper of the Achdiocese of Boston:
Weigel speaks of Pope Benedict XVI
at monthly Legatus meeting
By Christine Williams
Posted: 9/28/2007
WESTON, Massahusetts - Pope Benedict XVI has been placed in the role of a star basketball player seeking to shoot the game-winning basket with seconds on the clock, said George Weigel at the monthly Legatus meeting on Sept. 20.
Rather than playing for an NBA title, the Bavarian-born expositor of the Catholic faith is attempting to contend to save Europe, currently committing demographic suicide. The only thing that can save Europe is for its people to reencounter their Christian roots, Weigel said.
Speaking on the theme “Pope Benedict XVI; After Two Years,” Weigel addressed the Boston chapter of Legatus at the Weston Golf Club. Legatus is a membership organization for Catholic business leaders and their spouses. The Boston chapter typically meets on the third Thursday of each month. The evening includes a discussion on Christ in the workplace, Mass, dinner and a speaker.
Weigel, an author and syndicated columnist, has spoken to the Boston chapter three times in the last six years. He is a native of Baltimore and graduate of St. Mary Seminary College and the University of St. Michael College in Toronto. His best-selling book is
Witness to Hope, a biography of Pope John Paul II.
Working on John Paul’s biography brought Weigel close to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, whom he met in 1988. Weigel said that when he discovered that his friend had been elected by the College of Cardinals, one of his first reactions was “desperate sadness.”
“One doesn’t like to see people one admires, considers friends, have virtually impossible jobs thrust upon them, particularly when they’re 78 years old and looking forward to retirement,” he said.
However, Weigel was also glad to see the cardinal “free to be himself.” In his service to Pope John Paul, Cardinal Ratzinger had subordinated his personality and his will, even having his three requests for retirement denied.
Weigel said he thought, “Finally the world is going to see the Joseph Ratzinger I know. Finally the world is going to meet this shy, charming, lucidly intelligent, brilliant expositor of the Catholic faith on his own terms.”
In the past two years, Pope Benedict has brought several themes to the forefront of his pontificate. He has communicated to the Catholic faithful that the Christian God is not remote. Rather he is the God with a human face. He has said that the Church is most itself when celebrating the Eucharist - through the liturgy or adoration.
But perhaps his most important statement was given at Regensburg University in Germany when he spoke about the central problem of world civilization at the beginning of the 21st century. The problem has two sides - the first is irrational faith and the second is loss of faith in reason, Weigel said.
Irrational faith can allow people to believe that God wills them to “fly a 767 into the World Trade Center,” while lack of faith in reason leaves society more vulnerable to those kinds of attacks, he said.
Western civilization is like a three-legged stool, supported by Biblical faith, confidence in reason and Roman law. Those three themes can be summed up in three cities - Jerusalem, Athens and Rome, respectively. Currently, the Jerusalem leg has been kicked out and the other two legs are wobbly, Weigel expounded.
Europeans are used to the state solving problems, but the fact is that the governments of Europe will not be able to pay for healthcare and pensions in the future because their people are not creating a future generation, he said.
“The only answer to this is in fact conversion - the re-evangelization of Europe,” he said.
In order to create a future generation, people need to understand that the command “be fruitful and multiply” applies to them, he said.
Weigel added that there are many signs of hope in the current pontificate. While Pope Benedict has been largely ignored by the American media since their caricatures of him as a “German rottweiler” were found to be untrue, he has drawn large crowds to his Wednesday audiences. The crowds number 40,000-50,000, larger than the crowds that came to Pope John Paul’s Wednesday audiences.
Some of the growth can be explained by the daily visit of 20,000 pilgrims to Pope John Paul’s tomb. But people are also coming “to get fed” as they did when they visited Pope John Paul’s audiences, he said.
In addition, Weigel said that Pope Benedict’s upcoming visit to the United Nations in New York will remind people in the United States, particularly the media, that he is “worth paying attention to.”
Scot Landry, president of the Boston chapter of Legatus, said of Weigel’s comments, “George did a tremendous job of outlining the roots that underlie the leadership that Pope Benedict XVI is providing to the Church.”
Weigel is a popular speaker who last spoke to the chapter four years ago, he added.
Landry is also Secretary for Advancement and Chief Development Officer of the Archdiocese of Boston.
Andreas Widmer, the Boston Legatus program chair and former Swiss Guard, called Weigel one of the “foremost commentators of all things Catholic in America.”
On the other hand, this article from Canada's National Post clearly is skeptical about the Pope's objectives, although it does try to balance anti-Benedict voices like Fr. Reese with pro-Benedict voices like Fr. Neuhaus.
The Pope picks his battles:
Benedict's stand against
'dictatorship of relativism' has doubters
Charles Lewis
Published: Friday, September 28, 2007
When Pope Benedict XVI used a Sunday sermon last week to warn Roman Catholic theologians against becoming arrogant - just as it was revealed that one had been put under investigation for conceding non-Christian religions have a role in salvation - he was continuing a pattern that started earlier in the summer. The Pope's homily followed two similarly hard-line pronouncements that gave a clear indication of what this papacy would stand for.
First there was an announcement to allow a broader use of the old Latin Mass, a step back from the liturgical reforms of Vatican II; and then a pronouncement from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the church's ideological overseer, that Protestant churches were defective and not really full churches like the Catholic Church.
"He wants to draw a line, make distinctions, increase clarity - even if it upsets people," said Thomas Reese, a priest who stepped down as editor of the Jesuit magazine
America under pressure from the Vatican just after Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger became Pope Benedict.
"The problem with Benedict is that in his heart he's a German professor
without a politically sensitive bone in his body. He doesn't know how to read an audience. A teacher doesn't have to worry about reading his classroom. They have to memorize what he says and give it back on the exam or they flunk. It just doesn't work that way when you're Pope."
While Pope John Paul II identified the enemy as communism, and then helped to dismantle the Soviet empire, Pope Benedict sees the enemy as relativism, an offshoot of secularism in which it does not matter what you believe and there is no absolute truth.
It is not an exaggeration to say the Pope is waging a war against relativism. He can see the fallout in the desperately low Mass attendance in Europe, the regulation of same-sex unions and the erosion of many religious orders. The Vatican even failed to get a mention of God in the new European constitution. Add to this that Europe now has millions of faithful followers of Islam, and it is no wonder the Pope occasionally worries about the future of the faith.
Just before succeeding John Paul II in April, 2005, he gave this homily that has become the touchstone of his reign. "To have a clear faith ... is often styled a fundamentalism. Meanwhile relativism, meaning allowing oneself to be carried away 'here and there by any wind of doctrine,' appears as the only attitude to modern times. What's being constructed is a dictatorship of relativism, which recognizes nothing as definite and that regards one's self and one's own desires as the final measure."
To Richard Gaillardetz, a professor of Catholic studies at the University of Toledo in Ohio, the three statements this summer are linked to that homily and were "warning shots across the bow" against those who would make the Church look divided or say Vatican II was a repudiation of the past.
"The only way to confront the dictatorship of relativism is with a more robust assertion of the uniqueness of the revelation of God in Christ, which continues to be preserved in the Catholic Church," he said.
"I understand that framework, I understand his fears, but I'm not sure his solution is going to work.... I think there is a danger you succumb to kind of a historical romanticism."
As for the Pope's warning to theologians, Prof. Gaillardetz said: "The moment you talk about a dictatorship you invite this battle cry language, this us-against-them fight for the integrity of the Christian faith ... there's not a lot of room for debate."
Fr. Reese said when the Pope was head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith under John Paul II, he went after theologians who questioned the church's teachings on sex, especially birth control, and theologians who were interpreting the Gospel as a means to overthrow oppressive regimes in Latin America. And now the doctrinal enforcer is going after Peter Phan, the Georgetown University theologian, for his inter-religious views.
"He feels he has clear and distinct ideas and responses to these issues, and he wants theologians to echo his position and not confuse people with their creative ideas," said Fr. Reese, who now teaches at the Woodstock Theological Center in Washington.
"But frankly, how many people read Peter Phan until the Vatican went after him? Most of these people that the Vatican have gone after are in no way endangering the faith of the people in the pews, because the people in the pews don't even know they exist. Seems to me it's a much better process to let the theologians fight it out among themselves."
Fr. Richard Neuhaus, the Canadian-born editor of
First Things, an influential New York-based magazine about religion and public life, believes
theologians have to "think with the Church" and not undermine its teachings. And when someone steps too far away, they should no longer be called Catholic theologians. (The Catholic Church actually licenses its theologians and being stripped of that licence can prevent someone from teaching at a Catholic university.)
Fr. Neuhaus, who also works closely with Evangelical Protestants in the United States on issues of common concern such as gay marriage and abortion, but also on broader areas of faith, said the Evangelicals he works with were not at all insulted by the Vatican's remarks on Protestant churches.
He said secularism is often "anti-religious and anti-Christian," and it is right for Pope Benedict to fight a system of thinking that wants to exclude religion from the public debate.
"The fact is the institutional separation of church and state is something that is to be cherished. But you cannot separate religion and public life. If you have an overwhelming majority [as in the United States] who claim to be religious and Christian, and if they believe as we know they do that morality is connected to religion, to exclude religion from public life is to exclude morality from public life. And that simply undermines the whole foundation of democracy."
Brian Stiller, the president of Tyndale University College and Seminary, a Christian school in Toronto, admires the Pope for bringing "certitude." Evangelicals and Catholics in Canada have worked closely on such issues as abortion and euthanasia and will continue to do so, he added.
"In a radically secular age, conservative Protestants have so much in common with Catholics that we find ourselves to be easy working partners," he said. "I give the Pope space because there is a public in the world that he thinks he needs to speak to and get something across. I wouldn't be surprised if it was intended for Latin America where there has been a great wave of conversions [to Protestantism]."
Not everyone, though, is so understanding. Rev. Canon John Simons, the principal of the (Anglican) Montreal Diocesan Theological College, and who has worked on Anglican-Roman Catholic conciliation for years, likened the comment about Protestants to one person telling another they are not fully human.
"I think that the unfortunate lasting impact that it will have among Anglicans is to set back the ecumenical progress that has been made over the last 35 years," he said. "When Anglicans hear these things being said, they say, 'What's the use of talking to Roman Catholics, they really don't take us seriously.' For those of us committed to the ecumenical movement, this is really disappointing, really disheartening."