VALENTINES FOR BENEDICT - AND FROM BENEDICT
Whoa! Not that this silly bishop should be answered, but maybe the Bulgarian Orthodox Church should also require that their non-ordained metropolitans be educated? It's the Orthodox Church that broke away from the the 'unam, sanctam, cattolicam et apostolicam Ecclesiam'. How can the adherent of the original faith be the heretic?
Anyway, here is the translation of the first of two nice Valentine's Day article about Pope Benedict XVI and his apostolate of love, shared by Lella from La Repubblica today (which took time out from its relentless anti-Benedict offensive of the past few days over DICO to publish two positive articles about him):
Ratzinger shows he is more man than theologian:
One does not love only the body
but also the spiritual beauty of the beloved
By Luciana Sica
Papa Ratzinger has cast asside the robes of abstract intellectual and sophisticated theologian to show himself as a man totally involved in the essence of man, which is his capacity to love and be loved.
This is according to Giovanni Reale, professor of the history of ancient philosophy at San Raffaele University in Milan, author of many important essays on the subject, among this a famous best-seller,
History of Western Philosophy, co-written with Dario Antiseri, that has been translated into many languages, including Russian. (Among his many honors, Reale is quite proud that he is an honorary professor at the University of Moscow.)
Is it OK if you are described as a Catholic liberal?
I am a Christian who is open, very open, and certainly liberal...
How do you evaluate the Pope's message (from the 2007 Lenten message released yesterday) where he speaks about God's eros towards man?
In referring to man's fundamental problem which is love, the Pope wants to point out that religion is not philosophy, it is not an abstraction. You know what Augustine used to say, "If you do not love, you are nothing." You can have everything, but it can all mean nothing, because it is only love that allows you to be - you are, because you love.
But the idea of eros implies sensuality, something very physical, isn't that so?
Eros is doubtless the passion of love. It is an acquisitive force that acts in order to take possession - it arises from the lack of something we need, but which can lift us, through beauty, to a higher plane. The physical aspect is simply the point of departure. Plato tells us in the
Symposium and in
Phaedrus that when we love someone else's body, we always love what is beautiful in that body.
But that's not usually said or thought.
When you really love someone physically, you always love the beauty of his spirit, or something beautiful in his spirit - that's the amazing thing. Love grows 'upward' even more when one loves the workings of that spirit. There's a philosophical knowledge that can reach the level of mystical union when one learns to grasp beauty in itself, as an absolute.
So it is not surprising that the Pope speaks about God's eros towards man?
Ratzinger says that God'n eros is at the same time total agape, a purely giving love, and that eros and agape conjoin. I find it a statement of great importance. It shows he is a man first - not an intellectuial - who has profoundly understood love in all its many facets, as a single reality with multiple dimensions that are not contradictory.
The Pope has also spoken of an impossible self-sufficiency in man, who can be seduced by the lies of Evil. Do you find such language convincing?
Yes. Think how much man has been damaged by the illusory promises of science and technology which purport to solve all of men's problems. It is clear that is not so, and that there are certain fundamental problems that can only be resolved through love.
Here's the second article, which in a way, comments on the Pope's Lenten message, released yesterday, as though it were - as well and rightfully - a Valentine from Benedict to the faithful:
A GOD OF EROS:
The Pope says God loves us with passion
and awaits our Yes like a young bridegroom
God, said Papa Luciani (John Paul I), is also a mother.
God, Papa Ratzinger writes in his first encyclical, is Love.
Now, the Pope-theologian goes even farther. God, he says in his Lenten, message, is also Eros. Because 'Eros is part of God's very heart."
It is a daring image, which shows how much Joseph Ratzinger is attracted and fascinated by the mystery of divine love and how much he is enchanted by the pulsating heart of Divinity, that which he tries to approach as a theologian.
"God's love is also 'eros,' he points out. "In the Old Testament, the Creator of the universe manifests toward the people whom He has chosen as His own a predilection that transcends every human motivation."
Agape and eros, two terms from Greek culture, were at the center of Benedict XVI's first encyclical,
Deus caritas est. The pope-theologian wrote that human existence revolves around eros, the love that seeks happiness '
in the other,' and agape, the love that epxresses itself in loving concern '
for the other.'
In this way, Ratzinger wanted to make it clear that faith does not scorn eros nor sexuality in search of a partner that one seeks to possess in all intimacy, but it must be complemented by reciprocal giving between a couple, thereby completing the luminous trajectory from the eros-inebriation that unites man and woman to a loving concern for all others (caritas). From the couple to society.
This time, Benedict XVI picks up the Ariadne's thread of the concept and points it upward. It is the God-man relationship that interests him. Or better said, God's attitude towards man.
The mystics know that one can be caught up in such burning love for God as to totally lose oneself in it. And they also know that the love of God can literally burn the human creature, as the great mystics have shown in their ecstasies which result in stigmata that some may well consider to be near-erotic. [
Very apropos, see the entry yesterday on St. Catherine dei Ricci in the SAINTS thread.]
In his message, Papa Ratzinger is careful to underline that divine love is not limited to paternal, protective love, but also manifests itself as an authentic 'passionate love.'
And he goes back to Biblical sources in which the relations between God and Israel were always preferentially described as that beween bride and bridegroom.
Agape, writes the Pope in his Lenten message, is the "sacrificial love of someone who only wants the good of the other." This certainly has been God's attitude since the Creation. But, the Pope adds, "eros is the love of someone who wishes to possess what he lacks and yearns for union with the beloved."
It is the God who yearns for union with man that Ratzinger powerfully evokes in this message. God is not content unless he enters into this communication with man, the Pope seems to say.
And so he states clearly: "The love with which God surrounds us is without a doubt, agape...But there is also a divine passion." And this passionate urge is described in the Bible "with audacious images, like the love of a man for an adulterous woman."
It is true. The Old Testament describes the relationship between God and His chosen people with all the physicality, carnality, desire and rage of a relationship between a lover and his beloved.
Ratzinger states: "The Biblical texts show that eros is part of the very heart of God. The Almighty awaits the 'yes' of His creatures as a young bridegroom that of his bride."
What comes to mind here - and certainly, to the Pope as he wrote his message - are the enthralling images from the Song of Songs, which Hebrew tradition, and later the Christian, have always seen as a vertical relationship: between God, lover and bridegroom, and Israel, beloved and bride.
The lover says, in an almost Mozartean context: "Let us go early to the vineyards, and there, I will shower you with caresses." She replies: "Set me as a seal on your heart, because love is as strong as death, and passion is as relentless as hell."
But it can happen that believers (Israel) do not know how to reciprocate God's love. Then God can rage at his adulterous bride and there can be scenes as violent as in
Cavalleria Rusticana: "Take off the signs of your prostitution," says God through the prophet Hosea, "or I will strip you naked...and expose your shame to all your lovers..."
For the Jews, the great sin that disrupted the God-man relation was idolatry. For Ratzinger, it is radical selfishness, philosophical self-centeredness.
"Unfortunately," he writes, "from the very beginning, mankind, seduced by the lies of the Evil One, rejected God's love in the illusion of a self-sufficiency that is impossible."
But God, as Hosea had proclaimed, awaits anxiously the moment of re-pacification with His bride: "I will draw her to me and speak to her heart."
To re-establish the pact, Ratzinger says, speaking of the Christian way, God paid the price by shedding the blood of His own Son, the Christ: "On the Cross, God's 'eros' for us is made manifest. 'Eros' is indeed - as Pseudo-Dionysius expresses it - that force 'that does not allow the lover to remain in himself but moves him to become one with the beloved'".
And he adds poetically: "Is there an eros more 'mad' than that which led the Son of God to make Himself one with us even to the point of suffering as His own the consequences of our offences?"
On the Cross, the circle closes. With love.
==============================================================
The byline for this article was omitted in the original post. I will add it as soon as I find out.
Let me add a third article now, from Angela Ambrogetti, who, I've found out today, now works for Vatican Radio (after having lost her job when the TV channel Telepace dissolved its Vatican news service overnight).
Like the piece she wrote about Benedict, which I posted in POPE-POURRI the other day, she wrote this for PETRUS, 'the first online newspaper dedicated to the Apostolate of Benedict XVI', in the words of its editor, Gianluca Barile, who is the president of the Papa Benedetto Fan Club. (If you have not already seen it, the address is www.papanews.it. It's a very admirable initiative, and I wish there were some way they could add an English section.)
In this, Angela comments about the Pope's Lenten message.
Only someone 'in love'
can write certain things
By Angela Ambrogetti
Only someone in love can write such things! That was the comment of another Christ lover like my friend Orazio Petrosillo, Vaticanista of
Il Messaggero (whose absence we all feel so much - may he recover soon!) when he wrote about the Pope's first encyclical,
Deus caritas est. [
Petrosillo had a stroke while covering the Pope's vacation in Les Combes last summer, and has been hospitalized since; his standing as a Vaticanista may be judged from the fact that he was being mentioned at the time for the editorship of Osservatore Romano]
But this encyclical was not programmatic! It's a theologian's outburst, said the 'secularists' among us, the Vaticanisti who only 'look for the news' and do not know that the NEWS has been there for 2000 years but they do not know how to tell it, perhaps becuase they do not understand it.
Yesterday morning, the Press Room of the Holy See was only half-full - precisely because there was no 'news' of the kind the secularists expect - when don Oreste Benzi, presiddent of the John XXIII Foundation [
along with Archbishop Josef Cordes of Cor Unum] presented the Pope's Lenten message for 2007.
God's love is also eros, an exclusive love, a love that thirsts for love, as it did on the Cross, the Pope said in his message. Is this not the 'news' that we should learn every day? About a love that unites both giving freely and the passionate desire for reciprocity that gives rise to an inebriation which makes the heaviest sacrifices seem light?
But what about a political, a social component in this message?
"...(R)ecognizing the wounds inflicted upon the dignity of the human person;...to fight every form of contempt for life and human exploitation and to alleviate the tragedies of loneliness and abandonment of so many people," the Pope's message says.
Not enough? It's a clearcut program of work. Definitely demanding. It is a program for those who love, not for 'charity employees', as don Benzi calls them.
And yesteray, in that half-full room, don Benzi made us see Love. He spoke of children who were adopted even if they are gravely disabled, he spoke of prostitutes who have been 'set free,' he spoke of the volunteers who try to bring peace between Israelis and Lebanese, of prison convicts who have found a new life, of sick people who have discovered how beautiful it is to live despite their suffering.
And he spoke of Piergiorgio Welby: "I wrote him - allow us to join you and you will see that life is beautiful. Suffering allows man to find himself. And it is not sickness that truly afflicts us, but rather being abandoned. I would have wanted to tell his wife that one does not overcome suffering by ending life but by allowing it room. This would have given the story a beautiful turn." (Later, speaking to me, he said: "Unfortunately, that case interested the politicians too much.")
But to get back to the news. What news are we talking about here? Is it the draft law on DICO? But this also gives me another example to cite -
Yesterday afternoon, Professor Mario Agnes, editor of Osservatore Romano, presented a small anthology of Benedict XVI's addresses about the family. [
And did we see this in the news? Not in the Vatican bulletin! Which reminds me I really should make it a habit to check out Vatican Radio online daily. They're more efficient than the Press Office.]
This time the Press Room of Vatican Radio was full because the media was expecting an attack on DICO.
What did the jackals expect the presentors to say? That Christians are happy and content that the concept of the family itself is being shot to pieces? And over the fact that this follows divorce, abortion and assisted reproduction?
But Dr. Agnes said something which struck me: "With this book, the Church wants to be the Good Samaritan for the family - we take the time to attend to it while everyone else just goes ahead."
Well, dear colleagues in the media, there's the news. All you need to know is how to communicate it.
[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 15/02/2007 3.41]